This post is over 16 years old and may contain information that is incorrect, outdated, or no longer relevant.
My views and opinions can change, and those that are expressed in this post may not necessarily reflect the ones I hold today.
 

So my ACT is tomorrow. A bunch of my friends are taking it too. They’re all furiously cramming some last-minute studying, while I’m here … uh … watching Pokémon and eating gummy bears. On that note, I came across a mutant triplet gummy bear today.

I feel horribly unprepared and unAsian, seeing as I’m not studying and not freaking out about the test.

LOLWTF

I JUST REMEMBERED

I STILL HAVE TO PRINT OUT MY ADMISSION TICKET

BRB

… Now that that’s settled, I should probably go to sleep sometime soon. Testing starts at 8 AM, which probably means I have to get up before 7:30 AM. I still get about eight hours of sleep even if I go to sleep now, so I guess I can finish watching this episode of Pokémon first.

 

—§—

 

The Book Thief by Markus Zusak

This post is over 16 years old and may contain information that is incorrect, outdated, or no longer relevant.
My views and opinions can change, and those that are expressed in this post may not necessarily reflect the ones I hold today.
 

This is a book review I completed for World Literature summer homework at Prairie Ridge High School.

 

Pg. 2-170

The novel begins with an overview by Death, the narrator of the story. He describes the world in colors, and proceeds to introduce the main character of the story, a small girl named Liesel. Her mother, her brother, and she were riding a train to the central setting of the plot, Himmel Street in Germany. Due to political difficulties and conflicts, Liesel?s mother was forced to surrender her children to foster care, and the foster parents were to be Hans and Rosa Hubermann. However, during the ride to Himmel, Liesel?s younger brother died, and turned into a corpse that Death was to retrieve the soul of. Upon his arrival, Death remained present to observe the burial of the young child in the snowy, frosted, frozen ground. Just before leaving, Death noticed one more thing ? Liesel picking up a forgotten black book from the ground, titled The Grave Digger?s Handbook, to mark the beginning of a life laced with extensive book thievery.

Liesel?s new home was a cramped neighborhood, holding the name of Himmel Street, translating into ?Heaven.? Her new foster mother, Rosa Hubermann, is a short, plump woman. She does a washing and ironing service for wealthier families for a living. To show her affection, she frequently insults and beats Liesel with wooden spoons. Her foster father, Hans Hubermann, on the other hand, is a calm and collected person who lovsed to smoke cigarettes he rolled himself. He paints homes and plays the piano for a living. His close relationship with Liesel budded when he rescued her from the snarling hands of the bathtub and taught her how to roll cigarettes instead. Hans helped Liesel through her toughest times, including when she woke up in the middle of the night from nightmares of her brother?s death.

As Liesel became accustomed to her new surroundings, she began to attend the Bund Deutscher M?dchen, part of a group of Hitler Youth ? she had arrived during the time of Nazism. In addition to participating in her contribution to her political leader, Liesel attended school where she met a colorful collection of students, including one named Rudy Steiner that longed to kiss her. After a day in school when she made a fool of herself by failing to read successfully in front of the class, Liesel proved that she was a girl to be respected by decimating two of her male classmates. Over time, Liesel avoided getting in as much trouble as she once did, and adopted a new hobby ? reading in the middle of the night with Hans.

One night, when Liesel wet her bed due to her recurring nightmares, and she and Hans began reading the book that she acquired the evening of her brother?s death, The Gravedigger’s Handbook, after it was found while changing Liesel?s sheets. With the task challenging at first, Liesel and her papa began by reviewing the alphabet and correlating letters with words. Soon, they became dedicated to their work, and papa even excused Liesel from helping her mother picking up and dropping up clothing for their washing and ironing service to continue reading their handbook. With Liesel?s love of books only growing, Hans traded some of his cigarettes for a pair of books to gift Liesel with for Christmas ? Faust the Dog and The Lighthouse.

Not only did Liesel gain interest in reading, she also started writing as well. Practicing by writing on the basement walls, Liesel became skilled with words and soon began to write letters for her biological mother. Without knowing what had truly happened to her true mother, she wrote letters periodically and kept them safe until she was able to mail them. One day after collecting payment for Rosa Hubermann’s washing and ironing service, she spent a small portion of it for postage to mail her letters. After getting beaten by Rosa for spending her money, Rosa apologized to Liesel for the first time ? not for the beating, but because she knew Liesel would never really make contact with her biological mother ever again. Almost daily, Liesel went to check the mailbox for a response. She never got one.

Some time afterwards, a large event exposed Liesel to a new facet of the world. Liesel experienced her first Nazi book burning. The thrill of the moment captured Liesel?s attention, as she saw the piles of Jewish paraphernalia burst into flames. After the burning, Liesel asked Hans about her mother: why she was taken away from her, why she never responded to her letters, and where she was now. After establishing the idea that her mother could have been a communist, and she was likely taken away by the F?hrer, Liesel declared that she hated Hitler. For the first time, Hans struck Liesel, flat across the face, following up by stating that those words should never be said in public. Moments later, when her father was occupied with discussion, Liesel stole her next book, an undamaged book from the pile from the book burning. As she crept away with The Shoulder Shrug, the heat emitting from the book burned her.

While going to pick up washing and ironing from the mayor?s house, Liesel discovered one day that Ilsa Hermann, the mayor?s wife, had and maintained a personal library in her home. After being invited into the mayor?s home, Liesel embraced the sight of a multitude of books, all properly organized in shelves. Returning periodically to pick up and return the washing and ironing, Liesel read a few pages from a book in the library each visit. In addition to reading, Liesel heard stories about Ilsa’s son and how he died. Before leaving that day, Liesel chose to say “I’m sorry” to Ilsa for what had happened to her son. Before Liesel heard the “For what?” she was already out the door.

Himmel Street was a poor place. Both Liesel and Rudy had difficulty surviving with the rations of food they were provided. One day, the pair ran into a boy with a massive mound of apples. Upon chasing him into the woods, Liesel and Rudy encountered Arthur Berg, a master thief, and their true thieving careers began. Their first successful raid was a farm with apple trees, and yielded a dozen apples to be split between Liesel and Rudy. After overeating, both threw up after returning to their homes because their stomachs weren?t used to it. Liesel blamed it on Rosa?s pea soup.

Finally, a Jewish man was introduced into the setting. Formerly a Jewish fist fighter, and a daring, perseverant man, Max Vandenburg was now confined to a storage space so he would not be caught and brutally punished by the Nazis. He had received a copy of Mein Kampf from a man named Hans Hubermann. Max had never met this man before, but he was to find Hans in his house. Disguised as a German, he travelled to Himmel Street where Hans lived. He removed the key to the front door from the front cover of Mein Kampf where it had been taped. After squeezing the key in his fist, he leaned forward to unlock the door.

The first third of the book has great significance, introducing the main plot and central setting of the book. Its purpose is to accustom the reader with the general flow of the natural lifestyle of the Hubermann family. It also serves to describe the types of relationships held between Liesel and a majority of the characters present in the story. Without this section, the book would be missing the most important part of its content. Readers would not understand the significance of Liesel?s life and the reason why the story is being told. Also, the last several pages provides an introduction and background information of a new character that is about to enter the story. Without this transition, the new character?s entrance would be abrupt and unexpected.

A question that I have about this section, as many people probably do also, is about the future integration of the Jewish fist fighter into the Hubermanns? lives. In the time of Nazis and Hitler, Germans were not permitted to house or shelter Jewish people. However, in the last chapter of the section, the narration suggests that the Jewish man traveled to the Hubermann household to receive housing: ?Now he turned on to the side street, making his way to number thirty-three, resisting the urge to smile, resisting the urge to sob or even imagine the safety that might be awaiting him.? The book mentioned earlier that Hans Hubermann had previously attempted to join the Nazi party. However, after being informed of the Jewish fist fighter and his quest for security in the Hubermann?s house, one comes to think that Hans may have applied for inclusion in the party for the sole purpose of masking a trait he may have ? love and sympathy for the Jewish.

 

Pg. 171-350

The second third of the book starts off with the entrance of Max Vandenburg into the Hubermann household. He awkwardly asks Hans if he still plays the accordion, bridging into a flashback told by Death. Remembering the events of the Great War, Death proceeds to explain a day when Hans Hubermann was exempt from participating in a battle due to his writing ability. While he was helping the captain write letters, the other soldiers went into battle and did not return. Hans was the only soldier under his sergeant that was still alive. Hans had a good friend during this time whose family he tracked down after his return from the Great War. His friend was Erik Vandenburg ? Erik had taught Hans how to play the accordion. The strong friendship between the two made Hans feel obliged to help Erik?s son Max during a time when he needed help badly.

As Liesel introduces herself to the setting of the newcomer, wondering why a stranger was uncontrollably eating Rosa?s pea soup, she experienced a completely new feeling. As Rosa and Hans lectured her about the dangers of telling someone that there was a Jewish man hiding in their basement, Liesel complied but remained confused at the entire situation. Hans then added some clear consequences: ?I will take each and every one of your books ? and I will burn them. I?ll throw them in the stove or fireplace. They?ll take you away from me.? After striking severe fear in Liesel, Hans comforted Liesel for a few minutes.

Upon the first true person-to-person encounter between Liesel and Max, the young girl was unsure what to do. After speaking shortly, however, they instantly became good friends and found similarities between their personalities. Their first discussion involved their nightmares ? the images of Liesel losing her little brother, and the images of Max leaving his family. After feeling the soothing relief of sharing his troubles with another person, Max began writing a novel using the ripped-out and painted-over pages of Mein Kampf. He wrote about his life as a childhood, his struggles growing up, and the new girl he met in the basement of a home on Himmel Street.

One day, going to pick up washing and folding from the mayor?s house, Liesel received a letter from the mayor?s wife addressed to her mother instead of the normal batch of dirty clothing. Upon receiving it, Liesel immediately knew what had happened. In the past few months as the economy declined, Rosa had been gradually losing customers for her washing and folding service. Even the rich families in the area were saving up on their money and doing their own washing and folding, which resulted in Rosa losing all but her last customer, the mayor. The instant Liesel laid her hands on the letter, she insulted the mayor?s wife in her rage. The thought of losing her and Rosa?s last customer made Liesel storm out of the house, wondering what exactly she should say to Rosa when she returned with no clothing.

Suddenly, one day, Max fell asleep and did not wake up. In Liesel?s concern, she could not get her mind off Max and started collecting gifts for him to share about when he woke up. The set of presents included a deflated ball, a ribbon, a pinecone, a button, a stone, a feather, two newspapers, a candy wrapper, a cloud, a toy soldier, a miraculous leaf, a finished whistler, and a slab of grief. After days and days of Max?s unconsciousness, and days of days of reading to him, Liesel broke out in tears. Although Rosa comforted Liesel and told her everything will be all right, she spoke otherwise with Hans. Liesel became deeply worried when she overheard Rosa contemplating what would happen to them if Max never woke up, and what they would do if they had a dead Jew in their basement. Miraculously, while Liesel was at school one day, Max opened his eyes.

A full-blown war was imminent. A reminder of the bad things it would bring came when the Nazi party started going door to door to check for suitable air-raid shelters. Liesel witnessed the Nazis progressing their way down Himmel Street one day when playing a game of soccer. Faking a severe injury to leave the game as soon as possible, Liesel made it to Hans immediately and informed him that the Nazis were coming. Relocating Max from the basement to Liesel?s bedroom, the Hubermanns braced themselves for the longest three minutes of their lives. As the Nazis descended the steps to the basement, Hans, Rosa, and Liesel shivered at the thought of having their basement used as a bomb shelter, wondering what they would do with Max each time the bomb danger siren went off. The Nazis came back up the stairs. The basement wasn?t deep enough. The Hubermanns were safe.

A quote that I particularly liked form this section was spoken by Death in his narration of the story as a side note: ?I?ve seen so many young men over the years who think they?re running at other young men. They are not. They?re running at me.? This quote appealed to me because it captures the essence of soldiers participating in war from a non-human?s, non-participator?s viewpoint. Because it is said by Death, the text of the analysis is not obscured or biased by patriotism, as may be if said by the soldiers. This quote creates some imagery of two large opposing groups of men separated by a black-hole-like being in the center. In the zeal of desire for victory, these young soldiers do not realize that they are not invincible, they are not guaranteed a victory, and they are not in a safe nor secure position. In their zeal, soldiers cannot see the fate that awaits them in the center of the battlefield. For someone not familiar with the antics of war, this quote gives an uncensored description of what war really is ? a blind suicide mission for innocent men with a misconception of their indestructibility.

While reading, I noticed the strong relationship building between Liesel and Max Vandenburg. I believe that this strong bond formed so quickly because both Liesel and Max needed someone close to them in their lives. The book described the miserable pasts of both Liesel and Max: Liesel had lost her brother, and Max had lost his family, including his mother and a close cousin. After meeting each other, Liesel and Max were able to play the roles of the missing important people in each other?s lives. Max could be the brother that Liesel once had, someone that she could tell all her secrets to and talk with regarding all her problems and struggles. Liesel could be the caring mother and cousin Max once lived with; Liesel?s nurturing and loving nature did wonders to Max?s loneliness in the basement. It is this family-like bond that pulled Liesel into sitting by Max?s side when he fell unconscious, ?pulling a lump of salt water from her eye and feeding it onto Max Vandenburg’s face.?

 

Pg. 351-552

After Liesel?s last day at the mayor?s house, after Liesel?s last trip to pick up washing and folding, and after Liesel?s last moments in the mayor?s wife?s library, she could no longer stand being so far away from the books that she once embraced herself with. In a quest to prove to herself and to Rudy that she was able to steal more than just apples, Liesel climbed through the window of the mayor?s house and into the library. Feeling the books that she was once able to read unconditionally, Liesel grasped one tightly and made her way out the window ? she was stealing what she felt belonged to her. After multiple visits to the library, Liesel noticed something unusual one day. The window to the library was left unlocked, and there was a large, thick book leaning up against the window. Upon its retrieval, Liesel found a note from the mayor?s wife explaining that her attempts at stealth did not succeed, and she was already aware of Liesel?s entrance. She stated that the large book was a dictionary that Liesel could use to look up words from her other books that she did not know. The dictionary was put to use well.

Meanwhile, real war had begun. German was under attack by air raids, and the alert sirens went off multiple times for Himmel Street ordering residents to file accordingly into their proper community shelters. The very first alert was a false alarm, but struck resounding fear in the hearts of many Himmel Street inhabitants. In the last moments before leaving their house, the Hubermanns wished Max fare-well, as he would obviously not be able to join them in the safety of their neighbor?s approved basement. In the longest moment of their lives, the occupants of the shelter listened to Liesel?s soft voice reading one of her books, soothing the mood and relieving the tenseness of the air. Over and over, as Himmel Street took cover bombing after bombing, Liesel helped bring comfort to the dwellers as she continued reading her book, progressing further and further into the plot, while still keeping Max in the corner of her thoughts. During one of the raids, Max found the courage to come out of the basement and take a look outside while everyone else was taking cover. He saw, for the first time since his arrival, the fresh air, and the lights in the sky. Not long afterward, Max left 33 Himmel Street: ?You?ve done enough.?

Occasionally, Liesel was able to witness the marching of the Jews, headed towards concentration camps. Every time the Jews passed, Liesel looked out for her lost friend, hoping he was somewhere in the crowd, and every time the Jews passed, he was nowhere to be seen. One day, Hans decided to offer the passing Jews a small portion of bread and got severely beaten for the act by the Nazi guardsmen. Not long afterward, Hans received his real punishment ? he was finally accepted into the Nazi party, but it was in an unexpected manner. In order to serve and promote the Nazi party, Hans was ordered to fight for the Nazis in war. He was sent off to combat and had no choice as to what to do. To make situations worse, Rudy?s father was also forced to participate.

While at war, Hans had some of the most heart-wrenching experiences. Assigned to a department responsible for uncovering and identifying bodies severely dismembered in attacks, Hans saw the most gruesome facets of war. Back at home, Liesel witnessed the true feelings Rosa had for Hans. Under the insults Rosa hurled at Hans on a daily basis, there was a warm Rosa, a Rosa that missed Hans greatly. Liesel saw her foster mother grasping onto Hans? accordion, engulfed in depression and sadness. Although she may not have shown it, Rosa longed to be with Hans again. During a trip one day, Hans got into an argument with another member of his team. While unexpectedly changing positions in a truck they were riding, a fatal accident occurred, and the man sitting in the seat Hans would have normally occupied was killed. Hans survived with a slight arm injury and was sent back home due to a disability.

The end of the world came one day on a peaceful night. Liesel?s world came crashing down while she was in the basement writing her novel. The sirens had not sounded that night, and Himmel Street was laid to ruins. The sole survivor was Liesel, who had been in her basement, protected and unaware of what had happened. As Liesel breathed in the musty air, she ran from dead body to dead body, unsure what had become of her life. The only people she knew had all been taken from her. As she made her final visit to Rudy?s house, she decided Rudy did deserve that kiss he longed for. Years later, Liesel met up with Rudy?s father, who had been safe from the bombing due to his serving in the military. They continued with his clothing tailoring business, and eventually even received a visit from Max Vandenburg.

As the novel closed, Death describes how he learned of the life of Liesel Meminger. I found the book very unique in the way it uses a very unexpected viewpoint as the narration. Because the storyline is described by a supernatural being?s viewpoint, the reader receives an insight to the plot that normal characters would not be able to provide. After Liesel’s death, she meets with Death and asks him if he read her autobiography. This confrontation was effective because it creates an analogy of television to real life ? Liesel was in a television the entire story, as we were watching her and learning of her past, but she then becomes a real-life being and has a discussion with our narrator, which we have built a personal relationship with while reading the book. The reader sees Liesel as more of a real person instead of just a fictional character after she is extracted from the storyline and given the personality of ?one of us."

Finally, the last line of the book intrigued me. Labeled as ?a last note from your narrator,? Death says, ?I am haunted by humans.? This made me think of how everyone is uncomfortable in foreign situations. Children have nightmares all the time because they think a beast of a different specie ? the closet monster, the under-the-bed monster, the toe-eating monster, etc. ? is hiding in their bedroom, waiting to assault them after they fall asleep. This even happens between races of humans ? immigrants coming to America are inevitably mistreated, and even Americans touring to other countries are inevitably discriminated against. After such a supernatural being as Death stated that he is haunted by humans, a specie that he is far more powerful than, it enforced my views on why people have difficulty adapting to others different from themselves. Humans do not enjoy being placed in situations they are not used to, may it be a different environment or with different people.

 

—§—

 

Brave New World by Aldous Huxley

This post is over 16 years old and may contain information that is incorrect, outdated, or no longer relevant.
My views and opinions can change, and those that are expressed in this post may not necessarily reflect the ones I hold today.
 

This is a book review I completed for World Literature summer homework at Prairie Ridge High School.

 

Pg. 1-86

A group of students receive a tour of a scientific- building from a director as the story begins. Wandering from machine to machine, students furiously take notes as the director describes the process they are witnessing. This scientific building is actually a giant human cloning factory, producing thou-sands upon thousands of identical humans similar to manufacturing products on an assembly line. The director describes how these engineered humans go through a process similar to human gestation in-side a bottle, where they are custom designed to fit their caste and future occupation. Additionally, the director emphasizes on optimizing these humans to become as useful and productive as possible as soon as possible, including reducing maturation periods to a handful of years.

As the tour continues, the director shows how the manufactured humans are trained at a very young age. A demonstration is shown where human infants of the lower three castes are lined up and told to retrieve some books. As the babies crawl to the books, a severe electric shock and loud sirens terrorize them. The director explains that this allows the infants to make a correlation between books and discomfort, which makes them dislike education and ultimately prevents them from ?wasting? their time studying to become better people, as members of their caste need not learn as much as members of a higher caste. Similarly, infants of the higher two classes are told using a voice recording that they must achieve more than the lower three castes, thus programming and conditioning the infants, but this time using a process called hypnop?dia instead of pain correlation.

Further into the tour, a comparison is made between the time of the setting of the book and the current setting of the reader. As the students watch the manufactured infants engage in erotic behavior, the director explains that a long time ago, in a previous period where natural human reproduction occurred, sexual activity during childhood was considered inappropriate and unacceptable. I believe the analogy made between the differences of what was and is considered inappropriate gave insight into what cultural taboo really is. The students receiving the tour were educated similarly to how the manufactured humans are educated, and they are told how to live life correctly. I personally believe that taboos are rarely linked to what is really ethically right or wrong, and is more influenced by what others claim is embarrassing or private. Seeing as these manufactured humans feel no shame exhibiting sexual behavior, the same can happen in modern-day times. Conclusively, this concept can be used as methods of revolution, when extreme changes occur within the population of Earth. Also, when misused, eras like Hitler?s can rise as people?s beliefs are changed entirely, and they are unable to tell the difference between what is really right or wrong.

I was intrigued by the emphasis placed on how the human production described was very similar to an assembly line, and picked up a possible hidden meaning behind the implications. Although the book was published in 1932, there may have been arguments regarding human cloning and unnatural reproduction back then. By stressing the significance of the inhumane assembly lines, the author makes a powerful stance against mass production of humans, as they lose their individuality, personal characteristics, and idiosyncrasies. Although the simulation of human birth greatly resembled actual gestation (the bottles with humans planted inside were taken down a belt measured by meters, with meters being equivalent to the days inside the uterus), the treatment the bottles received did not fulfill the nurturing care and love a human deserves when developing from an egg.

 

Pg. 87-171

Following up on plans mentioned earlier in the book, Bernard Marx and Lenina go on their scheduled date. During the outing, Bernard is severely embarrassed by Lenina acting so freely and publicly about her sexual life. After partaking in various activities together, like traveling via helicopter, playing obstacle golf, having a drink of coffee, and attending a wrestling, match, Bernard and Lenina eventually have sex. A day afterward, Bernard states that he never had an intention to have sex with her that night and prefers to act in a more mature and orderly manner. The couple then goes to the Reservation, and learns that the director has plans to exile Bernard to Iceland.

After reading about Bernard?s experiences, I think that he feels out of place in the caste system of his time. Concluding from his reactions to particular incidents, Bernard prefers the older and more professional way of life than the new system of human manufacturing. As shown by his reaction to Lenina’s demands, Bernard is a shy man that likes to take things slowly and steadily. Interpreting his response to Lenina’s sexual desires, Bernard has a more modern-day conventional style of dating and getting to know people. However, although he did not wish to comply with Lenina’s longings, Bernard proceeded to satisfy Lenina nonetheless. This made me realize that the problem of peer pressure and outside influences still affects and will probably always affect how humans respond to situations where they are unsure of what action to take.

Also in this section, a new character named Helmholtz Watson is introduced. Falling in the alpha caste, he is described as one of the most perfect humans alive. Holding the occupation of lecturer at the College of Emotional Engineering, he is extremely intelligent and attractive. Although Helmholtz excels beyond others in his caste, he disapproves of the new method of human production through assembly lines. He has a desire to prove that one can surpass what they are trained to do during production, and repetitive replays of recordings cannot defeat the power that comes with self-innovation. Meanwhile, he easily fulfills what alpha caste members are expected to do.

I believe that Helmholtz resembles a powerful human in our modern day that brings changes through advancement of ways. Although living in the age of castes and unnatural human production, Helmholtz has a firm opinion about the situation at hand, and strongly opposes to it. People like these in our modern day, good or bad, have brought changes to our world. By being able to live in the moment and plan for a future at the same time, people like Helmholtz have successfully improved the way of life. Although the book declares that this process was upgraded from regular human reproduction, I think that Helmholtz sees the flaws of lack of individuality from using this process, and he does not believe the improvement really is an advancement. These days, developing children and teenagers see people like this as icons. Being both conforming and rebellious at the same time, these idols act as influential leaders controlling their followers and leading them in the direction they believe is best.

 

Pg. 172-268

A new character named John comes into play and holds a large significance in this section. Bernard and Lenina first meet John in the Reservation, where he states that his mother comes from outside the Reservation. After introducing his mother, Linda, to Bernard and Lenina, they soon discover that there was never an intention for John to be born. According to Linda, the contraceptive malfunctioned, and John was born inside the Reservation; afterward, Linda was too ashamed of herself to leave the Reservation with a child, so she stayed. The distress and depression caused Linda to abuse soma, a drug said to have the same effects as modern-day addictive drugs, bringing a sense of temporary bliss and happiness, but with no side effects.

After learning about soma, I had a question: How could a substance cause someone to artificially feel a wave of intense pleasure, but not have any negative side effects? Essentially, modern-day drugs cause severe detrimental psychological side effects because they produce an unnatural feeling of delight normally unobtainable by regular means. As users become dependent on this feeling, their bodies desire more of the euphoric feeling, causing their minds to become stressed when not experiencing the exhilaration. Assuming that soma has the effects it is advertised to have, and has nonexistent side effects, it made me think that the only way this could happen is if the manufactured humans? minds were also altered psychologically. Similar to how the bottled babies were trained to be in particular castes, and customized to complete particular tasks better than any other individual of their breed, their minds may have been ?upgraded? from the emotional and seemingly weak humans we are now to unchanging and unaffected robot-like creatures.

Continuing on the idea of soma, this is an excerpt from the book: ?And there?s always soma to calm your anger, to reconcile you to your enemies, to make you patient and long-suffering. In the past you could only accomplish these things by making a great effort and after years of hard moral training. Now, you swallow two or three half-gramme tablets, and there you are. Anybody can be virtuous now. You can carry at least half your morality about in a bottle. Christianity without tears?that?s what soma is.? This description of soma?s abilities extends upon the original comparison it was made to modern-day drugs. Not only does it make one feel a rush of happiness, it also fast-forwards the endurance one requires to become a respectable person. By speeding up the ?moral training,? one may be able to achieve a high social status without placing much effort into their self-image.

Additionally, the idea of making someone more patient and long-suffering contradicts the firm castes the people must be a part of. Essentially, soma will make anybody a higher-class person if taken enough. By creating this substance, the original conditioning the babies receive when they are developing becomes useless, as they would be able to gain status using external influences.

 

—§—

 

ACT Essay Samples

This post is over 17 years old and may contain information that is incorrect, outdated, or no longer relevant.
My views and opinions can change, and those that are expressed in this post may not necessarily reflect the ones I hold today.
 

(Originally featured on Five Minutes in My Head v1)

Many people have come to me in the past for help writing essays for their ACT. The news spread that I received an 11/12 on my essay the first time I took the ACT, without any particular preparations (curse the grader who gave me a 5/6 subscore). Countless friends and classmates started asking me for tips on how to improve their own scores. Although I will not discuss specific strategies, I am providing samples of my writing by responding to ACT essay prompts. These essays were originally written in 30 minutes by hand (the amount of time you have to write the essay on the real test), then typed and published word-for-word into this article.

 

Driving and Cell Phone Usage

Recently, one state has passed legislation making it illegal for anyone under the age of 18 to use a cell phone – including hands-free models – or any other electronic communications device while driving. Supporters argue that such devices distract drivers’ attention from the road, and thus this law will lower the number of accidents and save lives. Opponents argue the law is discriminatory, since adults may use hands-free cell phones while driving. In your opinion, should all states pass a law banning drivers 18 and younger from using communication devices while driving?

When teenagers turn sixteen and receive their driver’s license, they are essentially receiving a permit to operate one of the most dangerous and deadly weapons known to man. Motor vehicles can leave a path of destruction behind them, and even destroy the person behind the steering wheel if used improperly. Recently, a state passed a law banning drivers under the age of 18 from using electronic communications devices while operating a motor vehicle. This is a good first step to saving lives, but I believe it needs to be taken further; in my opinion, all states should pass a law banning all drivers, regardless of age, from using electronic communications devices while driving.

When using motor vehicles as a form of transportation, the one and only objective is to get from the starting point to the destination as safely as possible. When other tasks are introduced to the picture, the focus of the multitasker becomes divided between or among the one or more new tasks. As more tasks and more objectives arise, concentration is diverted from the original objective of operating the motor vehicle safely. This reduces the likelihood of the objective’s satisfactory completion, and increases the likelihood of something going wrong during the completion process. In some instances, like eating a banana, unsatisfactory fulfillment has little to no consequences; unsatisfactory driving, on the other hand, could have a consequence of death. By eliminating electronic communications, one of the leading causes of distracted driving, commuters can place their undivided attention on the most important and life-threatening task at hand – driving.

The opposition may argue that using electronic communications while driving should never be outlawed to account for emergency situations that may occur to family members or friends. However, a multitude of alternative solutions exist for tending to emergencies. Sometimes, passengers in the passenger or back seat may be receiving a ride. Because passengers are not driving, their attention is not necessarily vital for a life-or-death situation, and could tend do the emergency on behalf of the driver. In the case that there are no other riders in the vehicle, a driver can easily pull over to the side of the road to take a phone call, putting his or her and others’ lives away from risk.

In summary, when it comes down to driving a car, safety is always number one. Although some people can control themselves, others require laws to set guidelines for them. By making it illegal for one to use electronic communications devices inside a vehicle he or she is driving, all the drivers affected by the law are one step closer to living a longer life.

 

Extending High School

Educators debate extending high school to five years because of increasing demands on students from employers and colleges to participate in extracurricular activities and community service in addition to having high grades. Some educators support extending high school to five years because they think students need more time to achieve all that is expected of them. Other educators do not support extending high school to five years because they think students would lose interest in school and attendance would drop in the fifth year. In your opinion, should high school be extended to five years?

 

Limiting Extracurricular Activity Participation

In some high schools, administrators have limited students to participating in a maximum of two school-sponsored extracurricular activities each semester. Advocates believe that over-extended students lack sufficient time after school to devote to homework. Other educators disagree, arguing that extracurricular activities offer students vital experience and opportunities to explore additional interests. In your opinion, should schools limit the number of school-sponsored extracurricular activities?

As we progress through high school, a variety of opportunities await us, including some after our academics that act as extensions of our learning experiences. By taking advantage of these opportunities, we can further expand on the core subjects we already learn and develop a new insight on the information we already know. I believe that placing a restriction on the number of opportunities such as school-sponsored sports and extracurricular activities that we may participate in only stunts the growth of our minds. High schoolers are generally sufficiently responsible to manage their time wisely, and can determine for themselves the best balance of academics and extracurricular, taking into account current academic standing, intensity of workload, and importance of extracurricular to their future.

First, school administrators looking to limit the participation of extracurricular activities by students making the statement only based off a general overview of an average student. Obviously, all students are different in the way they learn and how much they choose to learn. Some high schoolers take only the required classes at the most basic level, leaving more time to take more than the two recommended extracurricular. Others load their schedules with honors and Advanced Placement courses, leaving very little spare time to do extracurricular, and may participate in less than two. By setting the bar at the average, under- and overachievers’ special needs are ignored and cannot bloom into their fullest potential.

In addition, not only do school administrators look at the mere average of students, they also look at the mere average of clubs. The generalization of a maximum of two clubs does not take into consideration the workload of and position in the club. For example, some clubs meet only one or twice every week,and the time and effort put into them are minimal. On the other hand, some clubs meet almost everyday, and require a much larger amount of time and effort. Furthermore, even within the same club, position and ranking can determine workload as well. Using the newspaper or magazine club, for example: a reporter only has to find an idea to write an article about. They only have to proofread and finalize their one article. The editor in chief, on the other hand, must review and proofread tens to hundreds of articles and submissions, depending on the size of the newspaper. They must also approve the final draft of the final product after planning with all the articles Obviously, an editor-in-chief’s duties far surpass those of a reporter; thus, an editor in chief may have time only for one club, while a reporter could participate in more.

In summary, administrators should not limit students to participating in a maximum of two extracurricular activities because the administrators made the choice oblivious to the students’ individual needs. By restraining the mental development of the students, administrators are causing only harm to the student body, which was already capable of responsibly managing their own time and needs. Adults should not make ignorant, rough estimates of students’ intellect, and a two-maximum participation policy should not be applied to extracurriculars.

 

Restaurants and Nutrition Facts

In some cities, restaurants must provide detailed nutritional information, including calorie, saturated and trans fat, carbohydrate, and sodium on fast-food menu boards and printed menus. Supporters believe that consumers will make better food choices if educated about the nutritional content. Restaurant owners complain that a public display is unnecessary because the information is readily available if diners ask. In your opinion, should restaurants post nutritional information publicly?

Food is an important part of our lives. For some, it is merely a form of survival, while for others, it is a form of happiness and entertainment. In both instances, the food we eat must be safe and harmless to our bodies. Some restaurants add unreasonable amounts of fat and sodium just to attract customers and improve sales. I believe restaurants should be required by law to post nutritional information on menus, boards, or other publicly viewable areas. Everyone deserves to know exactly what they are eating, and displaying detailed nutritional information is a start to helping diners make proper choices without falling victim to business scams.

To begin, posting nutrition facts provides ways for customers with special needs to effectively make proper choices to fit their diet. For example, someone planning to lose weight may look into purchasing a comestible low in fats, all at the convenience of their menu. Others with health problems like high blood pressure may look into purchasing a delectable low in sodium. By accounting for a wider variety of people, customers can pick the best foods to maintain optimal health. Although customers can ask cashiers or waiters for a list of foods low in a particular item, some clients may feel uncomfortable sharing their health deficiencies with complete strangers. If the nutrition facts were posted on the menu, eaters can browse for compatible foods from the privacy of their table.

Some restaurants combat this argument by stating that nutritional information is always available as long as diners ask for it. This causes several immediate problems. First, a majority of customers are unaware that they can request nutritional information from cashiers or waiters. It is possible to post notifications of nutrition fact availability, but why post those when the space can be used to post the actual nutrition facts? Second, restaurants may receive foreign tourist customers incapable of fluently or confidently speaking English. The fact that out-of-country diners cannot receive the same opportunities because they cannot speak a secondary language is unfair and unjustifiable.

In conclusion, to promote the well-being, privacy, comfort, and security of various people eating out, nutritional information should be posted in all restaurants, bost fast food and dine-in. This will not only discourage restaurants from cooking foods with extreme amounts of unhealthy ingredients, but also promote production of healthy foods to attract customers planning to live healthy lives.

 

Schools and Vending Machines

Many schools have removed soda and unhealthy snack machines from school property. Some think this is a good way to combat the rising rates of childhood obesity because these machines feature high-calorie snacks with low nutritional value. Others argue that the machines are necessary sources of food and drink outside the hours the cafeteria is open. In your opinion, should schools ban soda and vending machines on school property?

You see them everywhere: giant devices with bright-colored lights and a stash of food behind a clear-plastic panel. Little children surround the high-tech food pantries in throngs, begging their guardians for a few coins so they can get something to munch on. Vending machines have become modern-day concession stands without the person behind the counter. Vending machines can be used where ever they’re accessible, supplying a convenient energy boost whenever needed. The benefits of vending machines far outweigh their potential cons like childhood obesity, which is not caused by the vending machine, but by the irresponsibility of the user. Therefore, schools that have removed vending machines from school grounds should reconsider their choices, and schools still possessing vending machines should keep them.

First, vending machines are beneficial for students as they supply a source of energy to last the day. A variety of foods with a variety of nutritional values fit inside vending machines, including fruit snacks with high levels of Vitamin C, milk chocolate bars with high levels of Calcium, and granola bars with high levels or protein. Additionally, students without definite break or lunch periods can use vending machines before the beginning of classes or between class periods to get the food and drinks they need to perform well throughout the day. While the cafeteria is only open during serving hours, vending machines are always operating as long as a supply of electricity is present, thus accommodating for a wider range of students and having a positive influence on the student body.

Furthermore, vending machines are also beneficial for the educational institutions and affiliations, and ultimately the community, that they are located in. Most vending machines are owned, operated, supplied, and maintained by third parties. Thus, the school with the vending machines on its grounds does not need to tend for them at all. More importantly, third parties don’t just steal the school’s space – for allowing them to use their facilities, third parties will give the school an average of 30% of the profits made in that building! This effortless stream of income helps the school raise more money to purchase better equipment, improve facilities, and better the learning environment for students overall. As a result, the value of the community increases, as it then becomes home to a more powerful education system and more respectable students and adults.

In conclusion, something so little as vending machines can have immense positive impacts on the development of students and communities. Because vending machines fuel students with the energy they need during the day, they deserve to stay on school grounds and continue to serve the students.

 

Smoking and MPAA Ratings

A number of health organizations are lobbying the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) to incorporate cigarette smoking into the criteria for a restricted, or R, rating for films. Since the R rating requires anyone under the age of 17 to be accompanied by a parent or guardian, supporters of this policy believe it would reduce the exposure youths may have to smoking as a glamorous habit and make these teens less likely to smoke as a result. Opponents of the policy believe it would curtail the creative freedom of the filmmakers. In your opinion, should movies be rated R if they contain cigarette smoking?

Smoking, drinking, and other health-deteriorating behaviors hold an unnegligible position in society today. Teenagers observe these actions frequently, may it be from friends, parents, celebrities, or complete strangers. To guard the well-being of our future leaders, health organizations are attempting to persuade the Motion Picture Association of America into classifying cigarette smoking as criteria for a restricted rating. I believe these health organizations are trying to opportunize on a subtle aspect of the big picture, and that the presence of smoking should not immediately flag a movie as restricted.

Primarily, the reduced exposure of smoking provided by upping a rating of a film from PG-13 to R does not have a sufficiently significant value. Teenagers perceive smoking from the people around them, and stars in popular movies only compose a fraction of the people teens see everyday. The impact made by limiting the observation of a minuscule percentage of smokers in teens’ lives is not worth the effort of rallying to modify the MPAA’s current rating conventions. Overall, these health organizations should conserve the time and funds, and instead contribute them to issues with a greater importance to the greater good.

Continuing, the presence of a parent or guardian does not necessarily affect the way a teenager takes in a movie. Just because a teen’s mother is sitting beside him or her does not make smoking safer or the scene less influential. The excessive loopholes present, such as purchasing the movie on home DVD or illegally downloading it off the internet, make the health organizations’ struggle pointless. In a worst-case scenario, a companion may prove to have a negative effect on the visit to the theater: a teen’s just-turned 18-year-old older sibling, now an adult by law and an approved guardian, could potentially act as a commentator throughout the movie, explaining how "cool and awesome" the smoking is.

Finally, the education teenagers receive nowadays gives them sufficient information regarding the detrimental effects of smoking. Adolescents are aware of the consequences of cigarette smoking. Although peer pressure may be an issue, smoking ultimately comes down to personal decisions. Merely changing a movie’s rating and hiding the aspects of the real world do not focus on the central cause of the issue – the power of choice. In their teenage years, as their minds develop, people are stubborn in the choices they make, and stand unmovingly behind their words to prove their accuracy. This, in turn, causes the health organizations’ efforts to become futile, as the power of determined choice is far greater than the power of attempted distraction from the fundamentals of living life.

Conclusively, I believe that the rubric used to determine a movie’s rating should remain untouched by the hands of health organizations. The excessive energy expended to make this change will not yield satisfactory or desired results. The numerous different facets of a human’s life prove that controlling and changing the progression of such a volatile group as 21st-century teenagers cannot be done by simply placing a poorly-constructed obstacle in the center of their path.

 

Social Networking Sites and College Admissions

Some colleges and universities, as part of the application process, have reviewed applicants’ pages on social networking sites such as MySpace and Facebook. Many support this idea, arguing that schools can distinguish between true and false claims of extracurriculars listed on applications. Others disagree, arguing that such use of social networking sites is unfair. In your opinion, should admissions’ offices use the content of applicants’ MySpace and Facebook pages in weighting their applications?

As times change, people change as well. Through technological advancements, we have entered the Internet Age, a time where everyday tasks are centralized on computers and electronics. Schoolwork is done on computers: we use online search engines for research and word processors for writing reports. Communication is done on computers: we instant message for immediate contact, or email for a more nostalgic, pen-pal felling. With this spike in computer and internet usage came social networking, a way that friends could make online communities and hang out while staying seated at their desks. Using social networking, individuals opened up to the world, revealing semi-private information and constantly updating current whereabouts. I believe that information acquired by college admissions officers from social networking sites should be taken into consideration at some point during the application review process. Colleges should know as much information as possible about their applicants, and social networking profiles are a doorway to a sector of an applicant’s life.

To begin, a social networking profile could be used as a truth checker to identify possible attempts at deceit on an application. This will allow admissions staff to better classify the applicants by levels of dishonesty and unethicalness. Teenagers tend to be more open and honest to their peers, and using information revealed during this state will give relatively precise information as opposed to masked or partial information a student may include in his or her application. Furthermore, friends interacting with the individual in question could also provide an accurate insight to the social status of the applicant. By observing comments or public messages, an admissions officer could determine levels of social amiability and respectability. This stream of unfiltered data can be invaluable when judging if the applicant is capable of successfully leading a positive life with peers in residential facilities, and could be significantly more accurate than potentially false claims made by the applicant him or herself.

Moving on, traitistic information provided on social networking sites not supplied on applications could help college admissions staff decide if their college is really the right place for the applicant. All social networking profiles have a space for interests, hobbies, or favorite activities. In these areas, users describe their true interests, not what they want their interests to be. In turn, by reading these blurbs, college administrators find out what applicants do in their free time, or natural lifestyle, instead of just their successful, academic background. By knowing the true nature of the students, compatibility checks would be optimized, and admissions staff can better determine using past experiences if their institution is the best choice for the student. This ultimately results in an overall better experience for the future of college-bound students.

In summary, by allowing colleges to access social networking profiles, not only do colleges benefit by getting a clearer view of an applicant’s true inner self, but the applicants themselves also benefit by indirectly allowing professionals to lead them towards a brighter future. By using the technologies of today, we can create a better tomorrow.

 

—§—

 

The Rise and Fall of a Copyright Infringer

This post is over 17 years old and may contain information that is incorrect, outdated, or no longer relevant.
My views and opinions can change, and those that are expressed in this post may not necessarily reflect the ones I hold today.
 

We all know those malicious people, those evil ones that lurk around the internet looking for warez. With illegal, copyrighted material readily available through torrents and other means of free downloads, copy­right infringement has become a massive problem. Between the five-day period of July 13-18, 2009, I experienced a unique copyright infringer, one stationed in the depths of the United Kingdom. It all began one day like this…

loveispoison:

hello

please review my website thanks

Thewebsite is for all those people that find it more convenient to bother you with their question rather than google it for themselves.

http://let-me-google-it-for-you.co.cc/

When I visited the URL, I noticed that it was a clone of Let Me Google That For You, and was thus violating the copyright of LMGTFY, LLC. I gave my opinion in the discussion, and got a response.

adamparkzer:

So just curious, what’s the point of having a clone of that site when we can just use http://letmegooglethatforyou.com/?

loveispoison:

what the point of google video or daily motion or other website that are the same?

adamparkzer:

You’re not getting my point.

There’s Youtube, Daily Motion, Hulu, and multiple other video sites because video websites are used with high frequency, and these websites are competitors. They program their own material from scratch, and they have their own specialties and features.

Your clone, on the other hand, is just stealing the work of someone else. I’m on the verge of wondering if this is even legal, as you’re plagiarizing someone else’s code and script.

If you want to use the "google video or daily motion" analogy, then think of it this way: It’s fine to have a Google Video and Daily Motion, but do we really need two Daily Motions?

Meanwhile, I wasn’t just sitting there waiting for responses from loveispoison, now obviously identified as our copyright infringer. Behind the scenes, I had already contacted the owners of LMGTFY, and received a response the next day. It went as follows:

Ryan of LMGTFY, LLC:

Adam,

Thanks for the notice. Yes, that site is in direct copyright violation of our company, LMGTFY, LLC.

It never ceases to amaze us how blatantly stupid and immoral some people are. This isn’t the first time we’ve been outright plagiarized. The only good thing for us is that we have millions of visitors per month, where these rip-offs rarely top a few dozen.

I’d post a reply on the forum, but I’m restricted because my forum account isn’t activated yet.

-Ryan and Jim

http://twitter.com/rmm5t
http://twitter.com/coderifous

P.S. Check out our live search stream: http://live.lmgtfy.com

After we got Ryan’s registration and activation issue settled on the x10Forums, he went ahead and made a post on the forum thread that this all this was developing on.

rmm5t:

loveispoison, Hi. This is one of the owners of LMGTFY, LLC. You are in direct violation of our copyright. In addition, outright copying code and rebranding it as your own just isn’t cool. Be original. Be yourself. Stealing other people’s ideas (and implementations) just makes you look like a fool.

As this was happening, loveispoison went ahead and created another thread on the forums, this time titled "check this out – Google Music Search tottaly legal." This was the post:

loveispoison:

copy and paste the code into your browser and see what happens

Code removed

tested And Working 100 % Guaranteed…………!! biggrin

Obviously, I couldn’t resist responding to it. The following was my response, then a forum administrator posting afterwards.

adamparkzer:

So essentially, it’s a script for prompting input, plugging it into a giant string to search for on Google, then hoping you can find a website that illegally offers the song for free?

Man, you’re on a roll with this copyright infringement stuff. First you steal LMGTFY’s scripts, and now you’re helping people find illegal ways to download songs by misusing a search engine?

David:

Referencing to above post by adamparkzer

Wow, someone who actually has a clue, you get a cookie!

lockd

With that, the thread was closed to prevent further responses, and the code was removed. Not long afterward, a THIRD incident came up.

loveispoison:

hi all

just finished this new site been working on the design for some time know its done but still needs some work done please review and if you can let me know if something is wrong or or ad something new thanks for reading know time to visit the website

http://get-vid.co.cc/index.php

Someone a bit quicker than me already noticed that his new site was again a site clone, and voiced is opinion. Additionally, after reading loveispoison‘s post, this is where I flipped.

sourfacedcyclop:

Err… whats the point. Looking at the source code, it just looks like you copied and pasted from
http://www.downloadyoutubevideos.com/

adamparkzer:

LISTEN. I AM BEING SERIOUS.

This is the THIRD incident in the past few days I can name off the top of my head of you infringing copyright.

(1) You stole LetMeGoogleThatForYou’s copyrighted code.
(2) You created a script to help people misuse search engines and acquire illegal music.
(3) You stole DownloadYoutubeVideo’s copyrighted code.

I already notified Let Me Google That For You’s owner, Ryan McGeary, and he was nice enough to just tell you that you’re directly violating their copyright and he didn’t take action.

I will be immediately notifying the owners of DownloadYoutubeVideos.com for copyright infringement. What they choose to do is up to them. If this continues, I will have personal discussion(s) with admin(s) so they will take disciplinary action against your account.

Although I said "If this continues," I didn’t wait for it to continue. Three incidents were more than enough; immediately after finishing that post, I started instant messaging a few moderators and administrators that I saw more frequently around the forums, or that had helped me out in the past. The next morning, loveispoison gave us a response.

loveispoison:

Referencing to above post by sourfacedcyclop

wtf copied my ass gtfo2

Referencing to above post by adamparkzer

hahaha what da hell is wrong wit ya kido let me worry about that not you dumbhead tell me something what if i copy your site what your gona do huh nothing hehe so buzz of and leave me alone thefinger but i dont copy others website and claim it as my own and yes i do copy some sites but for learning purposses only

As my friend Garrett said, "Go copy Windows for ‘learning purposes’ and see what happens." After his post, there were a few other responses made, and an argument broke out. An administrator that I talked with the previous day closed the thread before further flaming occurred.

Christopher:

Closing this before it goes too far

In the process of closing the thread, Administrator Christopher also shut down Get-Vid.co.cc, which was hosted on x10Hosting servers. But there was still the LMGTFY clone out. I couldn’t stop here.

LMGTFY Copyright

After filing an abuse report at 000WebHost.com’s website, I got a prompt response from a staff member notifying me that the website in question had been taken down. I let Ryan of LMGTFY know about my success, and he replied:

Ryan of LMGTFY, LLC:

Adam,

Thanks for the follow-through. We really appreciate it.

http://twitter.com/lmgtfy/status/2713134670

You rock,
-Ryan and Jim

All of loveispoison‘s illegal sites had been shut down. I thought I was done. I thought it was going to end there. Then I got a private message.

loveispoison:

well if you think ur who does not let go then you dont know me im worst then you i will copy your site and reup my website and make your life a hell that i swear on the devil thefinger and pormise you this corss my heart make your life a hell dont think this is a joke i will buy a hosting some were were yo thefinger u cant **** with any 1 even tell the host to shut me down but they wont shut me down and i know were thefinger

After shooting an instant message to Christopher and forwarding the private message onto him, we also came across a new thread posted in the Free Hosting Support area.

loveispoison:

let me begin i have to websites and yhe links are on my sig but there is 2 members who are tottaly racist so i made a post to review my website review my new website please

as you can see they are saying that i was copying other website so i wasnt u copying others and the website let me google it for you is a free script and they made a fake mad user as the real owner and said im the owner huh and my other website get-vid.co.cc it was suspended in there bcoz i was violating youtube.com temrs cmon there are 1000s of youtbe downloaders online and who is saing its ilegal so if you guys dont want me here then fine thanks and these are the user here who i dont like and are racist %100

check here

http://forums.x10hosting.com/members…itor_messaging

these guys below
sourfacedcyclop
adamparkzer

so if you still dont want me here then fine i leave but one thing i promise i will make those guys life a hell

This is when I noticed that loveispoison doesn’t know what racist means. This is also when Christopher laid down the hammer. loveispoison immediately received a ban from x10Hosting Forums. This is where we stand now.

 

—§—

 

Man Charged $23 Quadrillion for Cigarettes

This post is over 17 years old and may contain information that is incorrect, outdated, or no longer relevant.
My views and opinions can change, and those that are expressed in this post may not necessarily reflect the ones I hold today.
 

I read in the news earlier that a man named Josh Muszynski was charged $23,148,855,308,184,500 (that’s over $23 quadrillion) after he purchased a pack of cigarettes at the local gas station with his debit card. When he was interviewed by WMUR-TV, Muszynski said, "I thought my card had been compromised. I thought somebody had bought Europe with my credit card. It was very concerning." When questioned, the bank forwarded information requests to the card company, and the card company forwarded them to the bank.

When the company responsible was interviewed by other sources, they stated that the cause of the issue was due to a programming error. If you take the overcharged amount and multiply it by 100, you get 2314885530818450000. If you convert that to hexadecimal, you end up with 20 20 20 20 20 20 12 50. This not only shows the language of the programming error, but why it happened. For those not fully capable of interpreting hexadecimal, most C programmers will tell you that 20 is the hexadecimal equivalent of a space. Instead of inserting zeros, spaces were used as placeholders for empty slots.

 

—§—