Have you ever been to Disneyland? If so, do you remember experiencing all the rides, seeing all the colors, and meeting all the characters like Mickey Mouse, Minnie Mouse, Bugs Bunny, and Pluto? Can you visualize yourself walking up to these characters, hugging them, and shaking their hands (or, in some cases, paws)?If you answered yes to all of these questions, you just fell victim to deception by memory malleability.Bugs Bunny would never be found at Disneyland because itâs a Warner Brothers character.According to a study done by a doctoral candidate at the University of Washington, a simple stimulation of the mind with a fake Disneyland advertisement including an image of Bugs Bunny was enough to create false memories such that over a third of people questioned claimed to have met and made physical contact with Bugs Bunny at Disneyland (as opposed to less than a tenth of people questioned from the control group).Sure, this is an interesting study that we can laugh at, but it has a much more important underlying significance. What if this person recalling this memory was an eyewitness in a criminal trial, and the future of someoneâs life depended on this witnessâ reconstruction of his/her memory?Both in a courtroom and on the streets, “I saw it with my own eyes” is one of the most powerful phrases one can say when trying to convince someone to believe something. Because of our abnormal level of confidence in the idea that seeing is believing, we tend to put an irrational amount of trust in eyewitnesses. The consequences in a situation like the Bugs Bunny experiment arenât severe, but, obviously, the repercussions in a courtroom are much more extreme when members of a jury place unproportional weight to eyewitness testimonies relative to other more reliable sources of evidence like expert analyses and DNA test results.How exactly might an eyewitness to a crime get his or her memory of the event changed? Every time a memory is recalled, it gets slightly altered before being rewritten into the mind for restorage. This rewriting process is heavily affected by present personal and social environmental circumstances. For example, a witness may have seen an African-American as the potential suspect for a crime, but originally had some doubts. A few days later, this witness may see a completely different African-American on a breaking news broadcast being convicted of first-degree murder in an unrelated case. As she watches this story, she subconsciously correlates African Americans with crime slightly more than she did before. As this happens, her doubts from the crime she witnessed slowly diminish, and before she knows it, she starts seeing the original African American as definitely guilty.Because of these severe flaws in eyewitness testimony, I propose that, similar to how the results of polygraph exams are not accepted as valid evidence in many states due to their low rate of reliability, eyewitness testimony also be removed as valid evidence in the court of law.
The Problem with Eyewitnesses
This post is over 15 years old and may contain information that is incorrect, outdated, or no longer relevant.
My views and opinions can change, and those that are expressed in this post may not necessarily reflect the ones I hold today.
I basically took a larger version of that photograph,
That’s a photograph I took last year in mid-October. It’s not a very good photograph, but it’ll have to do for now. I’ll change it to a better photo if I ever remember to bring a high-quality camera around and end up running into a scenic view.
Those are fortune cookies that we got after ordering Chinese food for dinner. That’s probably the greatest number of fortune cookies I’ve ever seen in one place at the same time.
That’s the sketch the table next to mine drew out on the dry-erase board to plan out their software. I don’t really know what any of it means, but it looked interesting and complicated so I took a picture of it.I’m doing some of my own programming right now (for the Badger Herald, not for the competition; I’m not good enough at application development to be successful in the actual hackathon) and starting to map out a timeline for the final video that I’m going to make for this event. I’m probably going to make more than one video again like I did last year, and the first one should be done in a few hours or so.Check back tomorrow for more updates from the Facebook Hackathon.
I can tell you that the top used to say “HIGHLIGHTER,” and that’s it. I have no idea what anything else used to say, so don’t contact me asking for the solution.