History 364-0-01: Gender and Sexuality in Victorian Britain; Northwestern University, Fall 2014
The British Empire
- Expansion
- The territory started small, but spreaded to modern-day Canada, Australia, India, and parts of Africa in 1886
- This is a global empire – the expansion is all across the world and spread out (this is where the phrase “the sun never sets on the British Empire” phrase comes from)
- Athena represents Britannia and represents British power
- Empires are a place where goods can be sold – it provides a market; they also provide raw goods for manufacturing, which can be purchased from the empire and brought back elsewhere
- The United Kingdom is about the size of Michigan, but the Empire was able to provide Britain’s power due to its expansion
- India
- The Empire starts to expand past the presidency towns in 1756-1805
- By 1805, Britain still isn’t the paramount power and isn’t the dominant force
- In 1805-1858, the expansion furthers such that there are no longer any regional powers challenging British authority
- The British Raj (1858-1947) expands past India
- The mutiny is a traumatic event for British authority because they assumed they had a natural ability to rule India, through liberal imperialism
- They believed that by spreading their beliefs (i.e. about religion and culture), the inhabitants would become just as civilized as they were
- This caused a shift where religion and culture were not imposed on the Indian people
- India is considered the jewel in the crown of the British empire
- After Queen Victoria was named Empress of India, she was seen less as a powerful person from a foreign area, and more seen as someone who was accepting and involved in the new culture
- “Victorians Uncovered,” India
- In Indian culture, things happened in public that would only be permitted behind closed doors in Britain
- The Victorians tried to bring their culture to India and try to spread it to the Indians
- Women were told they should run their household as the British run the empire
- Sensuality was a trait that high Victorians thoroughly disapproved
- Women who committed adultery would lose their status and would be enough for divorce; the idea of introducing an illegitimate child into the family to receive inheritances was unforgivable
- Women were held at higher standards; adultery was enough for divorce, while men had to commit both adultery as well as abuse
- It was rare to see someone embrace interracial marriage; to encourage this, gold coins were provided for those who had interracial babies
- Wellesley refused to accept interracial relationships
- Interracial relationships of sexual nature had to be kept behind closed doors; although the rules had changed, the desires remained the same
- The Mutiny occurred when Indians felt their beliefs were being violated by being forced to have beef and pork fat touch their mouths
- There was a siege that lasted for months, the most notable of which lasted two months and 2,000 people died; news of this reached Britain and the press overplayed the magnitude of the siege by claiming much more people had died
- It was agreed to let the British surrender and escape through a river, but instead, the men were killed as they tried to leave, and the women and children were captured and slaughtered
- The Victorian woman was iconized as a violated angel
- A proposal was brought up that said Indian judges should be equals to their English co-workers; if passed, it would allow Indian judges to try British people
- The British wrote to the press and tried to prove that the Indians were not capable because they were not delicate and overall did not possess the appropriate traits
- James Hume, the government prosecutor, caught his wife committing adultery with an Indian man, and nearly beat her to death; he was advised to place the blame on the Indian man
- The media framed this as an Indian servant attempting to rape an English woman, and the case was blown out of proportion
- The British claimed that the Indian demons were preying on the innocent angels
- The judge and jury saw the Indian man as guilty because the victim lied and did not talk of their affair; this case was used as evidence by people stating that Indian judges (and Indian people in general) were incapable
- The truth was revealed only two years later by a letter written by a cousin, but it was not revealed until they were dead and the letter was discovered in their private documents