“The American Revolution” – American Studies @ IMSA

This post is over 18 years old and may contain information that is incorrect, outdated, or no longer relevant.
My views and opinions can change, and those that are expressed in this post may not necessarily reflect the ones I hold today.
 

The American Revolution, causing the American split, is best described by the American belief that the British provided an intolerable dominance over all Americans, giving themselves rights that no other American had. The overall cause of the American Revolution can be generally summarized by the envious nature of the Americans from their certainty that they were being treated unequally by the British, when in essence the British were not that bad.

When finding the source of this chaos, one can conclude that the Rights of Englishmen changed the way the Americans thought about the English. The beliefs they held were affected greatly by a few simple privileges the English had that Americans were denied. By the statements abiding to protect one’s property, numerous liberties are spawned.

Firstly, inheritance laws protect any property from ancestors that may have died. This way, no property is lost and cannot be given to higher officers without the owners’ family’s consent. These inheritance laws are provided that the husband is still alive, however. A female widow cannot maintain all of the beneficiates; however, she receives her portion of the inheritance. Furthermore, the widow cannot live in her previous housing: “she may remain in the house of her husband for forty days after his death, within which time her dower shall be assigned to her .” Furthermore, if a widow wishes to live by her own, she will not be forced to remarry under some circumstances: “so long as she prefers to live without a husband; provided always that she gives security not to marry without our consent …”

There shall be no taxation without counsel: “no scutage nor aid shall be imposed on our kingdom, unless by common counsel of our kingdom .” The British does not wish for others to assist them in any of their businesses without the acceptance of the British first. The only aid freely accepted is those from the city of London in a reasonable manner.

There shall be regular discussion among the higher classes of the kingdom regarding the aid or scutage provided to the British. When the discussion has been planned, it will be assembled as soon as possible: “… when the summons has thus been made, the business shall proceed on the day appointed, according to the counsel of such as are present …” The discussion will go on regardless of the presence of necessary people.

No unnecessary punishment will be given to anyone whatsoever. All punishments must fit the crime committed; the intensity of the crime will decide any further punishments. When the punishment is being determined, one has the right to trial by jury . During the selection of the jury, a fair selection with peers will be determined. Over excessive punishment will not be permitted: “and for a grave offense he shall be amerced in accordance with the gravity of the offense, yet saving always his ‘contentment .’”

When a person dies, his will becomes the determining factor of who receives his earnings. If a will is not written, the inheritance goes to the nearest kin: “if any freeman shall die… his chattels shall be distributed by the hands of his nearest kinsfolk and friends, under supervision of the church …” If debts exist, they will be paid to the king.

Upon unsatisfactory behavior by the British government, the citizens are given a right to rebel: “… and if we shall not have corrected the transgression … within forty days … those five-and-twenty barons shall, together with the community of the whole land, distrain and distress us in all possible ways … seizing our castles, lands, possessions …”

Finally, one of the final rights of the Englishmen is security in one’s home from unlawful entry. The home is a place of peace and tranquility, and one must feel protected. This right forbids any outside people from entering the property of an Englishman under penalties determined by a jury when taken to trial .

The origination of the Rights of Englishmen came from English history throughout many centuries in time. In the beginning, there were some privileges that only the king and queen was permitted to have. Later on, these rights were spread throughout the land, giving citizens equal opportunities at this luxury. Only Americans under the kingdom were permitted to have liabilities: “the founders of America began their lives as loyal subjects of the British Crown, proud to enjoy the rights of Englishmen .”

Americans felt discriminated against due to the fact that they were not permitted to have equal rights as the British. When the Americans were kept in captivity, they were not treated equally from the British. They were used as experiments for war. Children that disobey British officers were taken away, restrained, and beaten with a whip. Any supporters of the punished child are punished themselves .

Furthermore, Americans were brutally punished and used for inhumane experiments by the British. A movie portrayed two American men being used for testing the skills of the British. The American men were given a dummy that represented George Washington and were told to run. Behind them a giant herd of dogs and some men on horses chased. These repetitive inhumane actions caused the Americans to lose their trust and reliability in the British throughout time .

No assistance may be given to the kingdom without the permission of the king and many other high-classed followers and administrators below him. No loans may be made to the king against his will: “… such loans were against reason and the franchise of the land …” However, beyond this point, people are required to allow the king to use their money: “… and required to lend certain sums of money unto your Majesty …” Upon denial, punishment could include being jailed, confined, or molested. As seen, the British did claim some unfair power over the Americans.

The Bill of Rights was created to provide a greater, more equal living condition to both Americans and the British. Many new specifics were created, and were promoted to help the entire population.

To prevent anything from changing immediately, the Bill of Rights states firstly that no laws can be suspended or executed without the proper authority, consent, and discussion that must come beforehand. From this being outlawed, anyone who wishes to alter a law will have a higher difficulty doing so. From this law spawns a different circumstance where people will pretend to be in a position of authority to change the laws. This was stated in the bill: “pretended power of dispensing with the laws, or the execution of law by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal .”

The right of petitioning is given, and permission is given to petition the king. People who disagree with this are in essence committing a crime: “… all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal .” This new law provides a possible more friendly connection between the king and his followers.

Some of the new laws provide a more open and secure environment for the citizens. To reduce their fear of being attacked by the government, no military troops may be contained within the kingdom: “… the raising or keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of parliament, is against law .” This provides a lower chance for citizens to be harmed under an unplanned attack by the government for the sole purpose of a mass killing of its people.

Furthermore, any other previous laws could not be impeached; there was no way that a citizen could attempt to end a law already made in the past when at court. The only way this could be done was in compliance of the parliament.

The best attempt to reduce any unnecessary punishment was made. As stated previously, the punishment must fit the crime. As an extension, it was said that “excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted .” This maintains a humane way of living together with other people, not worrying about excessive, unnecessary pain when only committing a small crime.

To promote fairness, it was made that any outside influences of the jurors were outlawed. To maintain an equal decision, “all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void .” In the past there have been many outside possibilities that could have affected a juror’s decision. External payments in one’s favor could be one of the possibilities. With that reduced, fairness is maintained.

Finally, to improve the laws, discussion was necessary and must be done on a regular basis: “… for the amending, strengthening, and preserving of the laws, parliament ought to be held frequently .” Many previous laws forbid the changing of laws by many people. In this case, when a necessary and required change is found, proper action can be taken without breaking any former rules and laws made.

The power held by the British was the original source of the American Revolution, due to their envy. Political power is described as the “… power which every man, having in the state of nature, has given up into the hands of the society, and therein to the governors whom the society hath set over itself …” Without the followers, this power is deemed useless: “… and this power has its original only from compact, and agreement, and the mutual consent of those who make up the community .” When the powerful bodies have nobody or nothing to control, their power becomes insignificant.

Men wish and attempt to gain power for a variety of reasons, one of them being capable of protecting their property. Because of this, power is limited and controlled within the population: “… to limit the power and moderate the dominion of every part and member of the society.”

 

—§—

 

“Correlation Analysis Discussion” – Methods of Scientific Inquiries @ IMSA

This post is over 18 years old and may contain information that is incorrect, outdated, or no longer relevant.
My views and opinions can change, and those that are expressed in this post may not necessarily reflect the ones I hold today.
 

When a survey was conducted throughout the citizens of the United States, it was found that over 99% of all households in America own at least one television. Out of those citizens that did, 66% of them owned more than three televisions. On average, an American household owns 2.24 televisions. When the interaction between children and their parents were surveyed, it was found that youths prefer watching television over discussing personal issues with their parents. For many children, television was elected as their favorite activity. Compared to education, the ratio of the number of hours they spend in school to the number of hours they watch television annually was 900:1500 (California State University, Northridge). Information from the census denotes that an average family as 3.85 family members (United States Census). Using the previous information researched, one can conclude that each person has 2.24 ÷ 3.85 = 0.581 televisions for themselves.

 

—§—

 

“The Catenary” – Mathematical Investivations III @ IMSA

This post is over 18 years old and may contain information that is incorrect, outdated, or no longer relevant.
My views and opinions can change, and those that are expressed in this post may not necessarily reflect the ones I hold today.
 

A catenary is a shape resembling a parabola; it looks like “a hanging flexible chain or cable when supported at its ends and acted upon by a uniform gravitational force (its own weight),” as stated by Wikipedia. Originally Leonardo da Vinci concluded it was a parabola. However, later in the century, a group of mathematicians and physicists proved that this was incorrect and eventually named this new curve a hyperbolic cosine. Another interesting property about a catenary is that “a polygon, such as a square… can ‘roll’ smoothly on a track made of segments of catenaries,” according to the UBC Mathematics Department.

An image was added, coordinated, and tabulated in Geometer’s Sketchpad. When all the coordinates were provided, two points were chosen and were plugged into the hyperbolic cosine equation. When the equation was used to find some y-values when x-values were inserted, they were very close to the actual original image curve.

Furthermore, when three points were selected and the equation a parabola that passed through all three points was calculated. When this parabola was sketched on top of our original catenary, they were very similar but they did not match directly over each other. When the parabola was graphed, the slope of the catenary was steeper than the one of the parabola.

Our model is best described as a catenary because our points labeled in Geometer’s Sketchpad fit best under an equation of a catenary. When a parabola or any other curve is applied, all points do not match up directly on top of the curve; the points near the vertex or the slope or steepness of the curve move away or towards the selected points. Thus, the given equation will not be of greater accuracy compared to the equation of the catenary.

 

—§—

 

“PTC & Brussel Sprouts” – Methods of Scientific Inquiries @ IMSA

This post is over 18 years old and may contain information that is incorrect, outdated, or no longer relevant.
My views and opinions can change, and those that are expressed in this post may not necessarily reflect the ones I hold today.
 

We surveyed IMSA students to see if they liked or disliked brussel sprouts. If a neutral response was given, they were not taken as a subject. If we received a straightforward yes or no response, we gave them a strip of paper covered with PTC and asked if it tasted bitter or like soggy paper. If they stated the strip of paper was bitter, they were recorded as a PTC taster. Our sample size was 30 students selected at random on the IMSA campus. We used the chi-square test of independence to see if the ability to taste PTC is independent of the favor of brussel sprouts.

A majority of the IMSA students surveyed could taste PTC and disliked brussel sprouts. The ability to taste PTC was independent of the like or dislike of brussel sprouts (X2 = 0.130, df = 1, P = 0.719).

Scientists at the University of Toronto experimented with 25 subjects and the few that were able to taste PTC had a great aversion to cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli and brussel sprouts (Catalyst Spring 2005). One woman stated that she had so little tolerance for cruciferous vegetables that she had to spit them out. PTC tasters are more apt to dislike the bitter taste of many cruciferous vegetables (Tepper, 1998). Since these experiments focused broadly on cruciferous vegetables, all of them suggest that the ability to taste PTC may influence whether you like or dislike brussel sprouts. Our experiment comparing these two variables shows that they are independent of each other. PTC tasters have a very rare chance of developing goiter, or the enlargement of the thyroid gland, because non-tasters may eat cruciferous vegetables in large quantities. PTC affects the iodine metabolism which leads to goiter (Tepper, 1998). But brussel sprouts are full of vitamins C and K which affect the healing of bruises and blood clotting. Thus, the deficiency of these vitamins cause slower healing abilities for the human body (George Mateljan Foundation, 2001). Overall, PTC has its advantages and disadvantages.

 

—§—

 

“Strachey and Shakespeare” – Literary Explorations I @ IMSA

This post is over 18 years old and may contain information that is incorrect, outdated, or no longer relevant.
My views and opinions can change, and those that are expressed in this post may not necessarily reflect the ones I hold today.
 

Was William Shakespeare really that great of an author? Were all his masterpieces really genuine, original works of art, or were they mere imitations of other’s work? In my opinion, the connection between the play and the letter is parasitic; Shakespeare draws out ideas from the letter itself and avoids using his own thoughts to improve his own work.

The biggest, most noticeable trait of The Tempest being parasitic towards William Strachey’s letter is the storm at the beginning. As a distinct scene in both works, the storm shows the arrival and beginning of both of the plots. In the letter, the great force of the storm is emphasized in the beginning: “… the storm in a restless tumult had blown so exceedingly as we could not apprehend in our imaginations any possibility of greater violence; yet did we still find it not only more terrible, but more constant, fury added to fury, and one storm urging a second more outrageous than the former, whether it so wrought upon our fears or indeed met with new forces.” (Strachey 1) That quotation amplifies the power of the storm and its great immensity. In William Shakespeare’s book, the storm is introduced in a similar manner: “Heigh, my hearts! Cheerly, cheerly, my hearts! Yare, yare! Take in the topsail! Tend to th’ master’s whistle! Blow till thou burst thy wind, if room enough! … Down with the topmast! Yare! Lower, lower! Bring her to try with main course! A plague upon this howling! They are louder than the weather or our office.” (Shakespeare I.1.5-8, 34-37) The way this is written denotes the fact that the storm is too powerful for the entire human crew to control. Even through these numerous orders and attempts of control, nothing has come as a result.

In addition, another notable connection between the two works is the scene of the island. Strachey wrote about how the Bermudas were evil and demonic in nature. This exact idea can be found in Shakespeare’s work: “But felt a fever of the mad and played / Some tricks of desperation. All but mariners / Plunged in the foaming brine and quit the vessel, / Then all afire with me; the king’s son Ferdinand, / With hair upstairing (then like reeds, not hair), / Was the first man that leapt, cried ‘Hell is empty, / And all the devils are here!’” (Shakespeare I.2.209-215)

Continuing on the island, Strachey writes about violent thunder and lightning. Searching through Shakespeare’s book, one will find: “The fell together all, as my consent. / They dropped as by a thunderstroke. What might, / Worthy Sebastian – O, what might? – No more! / And yet methinks I see it in thy face, / What thou shouldst be. Th’ occasion speaks thee, and / My strong imagination sees a crown / Dropping upon thy head.” (II.1.202-208) During this scene, Shakespeare uses different language that can be found in the letter. Substituting his usual “thunderbolt,” he uses “thunderstroke” instead.

Still resuming on the island, the animals mentioned by Strachey are very similar or identical of what is used by Shakespeare. The animals included the “toade,” “beetell,” “battes,” “sparrowes,” and “owles.” (17-22) Ariel mentions something very similar with the animals: “Where the bee sucks, there suck I; / In a cowslip’s bell I lie; / There I couch when owls do cry. / On the bat’s back I do fly / After summer merrily. / Merrily, merrily shall I live now / Under the blossom that hangs on the bough.” (Shakespeare V.1.88-94) Also, the bird named the “Sea-Meawe” is described in great detail by Strachey, and the same is done by Shakespeare: “I prithee now, lead the way without any more talking. Trinculo, the king and all our company else being drowned, we will inherit here. Here, bear my bottle. Fellow Trinculo, we’ll fill him by and by again.” (Shakespeare II.2. 170-173)

Finally, the conspiracies spread throughout the letter and book can be conjoined with a few scenes and examples. In the letter, the conspirators threaten their lives by questioning the governor’s authority. Similarly, somewhere in the middle of the play, Alonso and Prospero get their lives threatened in a similar way. In the letter, Strachey describes how the conspiracies never worked too well because someone always gave it away. This same idea is present in The Tempest, when Arial says “This I will tell my master.”

Overall, because of these various reasons, I believe that Shakespeare’s work is just a rewritten replication of Strachey’s letter. It’s parasitic nature reduces the originality of the play and makes a reader think if Shakespeare is really as excellent of a writer as rumors say he is.

 

—§—

 

“European Colonization” – American Studies @ IMSA

This post is over 18 years old and may contain information that is incorrect, outdated, or no longer relevant.
My views and opinions can change, and those that are expressed in this post may not necessarily reflect the ones I hold today.
 

Moctezuma was very technologically advanced for its time. Apparent from the way the community was structured, it is obvious that the construction of the city was strategically planned with considerations of many factors. Even upon attack, a counterstrike or recoil plan was established for emergency situations: "Forseeing that if the inhabitants of the city should prove treacherous, they would possess great advantages from the manner in which the city is constructed…." The inhabitants are also resourceful. Even with a potential lack of supplies, great diversity is shown in their way of life. A shortage of raw materials introduces new imaginative ideas and forms of survival. A variety of animals are used as food sources. There is a large selection of vegetables: "… especially onions, leeks, garlic, watercresses, nasturtium, borage, sorrel, artichokes, and golden thistle…." Overpopulating birds are consumed: : "… where every variety of birds in the country are sold, as fowls, partridges, quails, wild ducks, fly-catchers, widgeons, turtledoves, pigeons, reed-birds, parrots, sparrows, eagles, hawks, owls, and kestrels…." The system of sales runs in an organized manner: "Every kind of merchandise is sold in a particular street or quarter assigned to it exclusively…." Religion is thought of as a necessity in their lives: "… they were bound to adore and believe Him, and no other creature or thing." In order to serve the higher bodies, humans are willing to sacrifice themselves. If the rules of the gods are broken, a potential punishment is death. Equality is distributed between all followers: "… commanded to put to death whoever should take the life of another." The gods were of mighty power: "The figures of the idols in which these people believe surpass in stature a person of more than ordinary size…." The system for transporting natural resources such as water was very efficient: "… laid two pipes, constructed of masonry, each of which is two paces in width, and about five feet in height." The established system takes in account possible failure of the system and provides a reliable backup solution in case of emergency or required maintenance: "the other pipe, in the meantime, is kept empty until the former requires to be cleansed, when the water is let into it and continues to be used till the cleaning is finished." This organized process serves the entire citizen population of the area: "An abundant supply of excellent water, forming a volume equal in bulk to the human body, is conveyed by one of these pipes, and distributed about the city." Nature is a large part of these inhabitant’s lives; birds in particular hold a special place in these people’s hearts. To retain existence, all of the species are kept in captivity within the emperor’s palace: "Every cage contained a bird of prey, of all the species found in Spain." Hundreds of servants acquire the job of taking care of these birds: "the emperor has three hundred men whose sole employment is to take care of these birds…." Their occupations entitle them to nurse ill birds back to health: "… there are others whose only business is to attend to the birds that are in bad health." The elegance of eating formally was prioritized: "The meals were served in a large hall … and the dishes quite filled the room." Rules to maintain proper manners were established. The cleanliness of the ones served was vital: "… napkins used on these occasions were never used a second time…."

The land of Hispaniola was inhabited by the purest people of the world: "… the Almighty selected this part of the world as home to the greater part of the human race." Everyone was very loyal towards one another and trusted all other humans: "… they are without malice or guile … obedient both to their own native lords…." Due to this peaceful relationship between all citizens, they were all physically unfit: "Even the common people are no tougher than princes…." There was no need to perform hard work; one did not have the need to defend oneself. They were truly natural, made by god as angels: "… would be the most blessed people on earth…." When the Spanish invaded this land of harmony, the inhabitants were stunned as they were unprepared for anything of this violent nature: "… tear the natives to shreds, murder them and inflict upon them untold misery…." Never in their dreams would cause harm to other fellow humans. In the trial of Spain’s destruction, Hispaniola was transformed into a barren, abandoned wasteland: "All these islands … are now abandoned and desolate."

Sieur de Monts makes a clear statement of refusal to trade with the savage-like New French. To enforce his new law, he establishes a consequential punishment of entire property loss: "… punishment of their disobedience may be assured … to seize, apprehend, and arrest all violators of our present prohibition and order, also their vessels, merchandise, arms, supplies….." Samuel de Champlain sets off on a voyage to Pont Gravé located in Honfleur. However, upon arrival, the weather conditions were unfavorable and his crew has difficulty entering harbor: "Our vessel was unable to enter the harbor, as the wind and tide were favorable." When stationery, Champlain discovers Gravé is ill and chooses to accompany him to his recovery. During Champlain’s embarkment, he visits Saguenay River, containing a powerful waterfall. During his journey, savage inhabitants notify him of migrative people they came across during their explorations. These nomads generally dwell at the end of the river, surviving off of hunted animal meat: "… savages, living only from hunting, and where our savages cary the merchandise we give them fur their furs, such as beaver, marten, lynx, and otter…." On the final day of the month, Champlain departs Tadoussac to head towards Quebec. In their path they discover and name Salmon River, "…since we caught some of these fish in it…"; Cape Dauphin, "…a point extending into the river…"; Eagle Cape, "… distant eight leagues from Cape Dauphin…"; Isle aux Coudres, having "… rocky points extending some distqance out into the river…"; and Riviere du gouffre, having a "… calm appearance…." Through the progression of the discovery of Quebec, the crew stumbles upon the Isle d’Orleans. Conclusions state an average man could not venture this far due to the harse climate and unfavorable terrain: "The wood is pine, fir, and birch only, with very ugly rocks, so that in most places one could not make his way." When the time of settlement came, the crew used the "Point of Quebec," haing resources enhancing the likelihood of survival. Upon arrival, enemies plotted the death of Champlain to claim his property, "to put into the hands of the Basques or Spaniards." To make this plan a success, crew members were seduced into joining the opposing forces: "… promising them many things which they could not have fulfilled." With not much time passing, all of Champlain’s companions were against him: "Being now all agreed, they made daily different plans as to how they should put me to death…." Very soon, friendly forces arrived and were able to arrest the leading sources of conspiracy: "On this very day one of our barques arrived, with our pilot, Captain Testu, a very discreet man." The discovery and establishment of Quebec resumed; construction progressed and the settlement was later titled St. Croix.

Jean-Baptiste Colbert writes to the king in regards to trade. He states the Dutch is low in quality for the textiles they export: "The manufacture of cloths and serves and other textiles of this kind … were and are almost entirely ruined." An argument discusses how improved quality would be beneficial to both countries; the exporter would receive more money for high-quality goods. In addition, he states the Dutch owe them millions in cash. On the contrary, there are some advantages to trade. With import and export rates increasing, potential jobs skyrocket: "… a million people who now languish in idleness will be able to earn a living." People are needed to move and transport these goods. More importantly, the production of boats will increase, thus exponentiating the French power: "The almost infinite increase in the number of ships will multiply to the same degree the greatness and power of the State."

Richard Hakluyt summarizes a book detailing on the main powers of the Earth. Beginning with Christianity, the men are encouraged not to abandon this religion, even if the men are "dryven to fling their Bibles and prayer Bokes into the sea…." Further the emperors and queens are introduced with their proper titles.

This nation John Smith describes of has people who live their lives in a simple yet complete way. They do not waste time on unimportant bodily care. Instead, the inhabitants find efficient and effective ways to complete these everyday chores: "… for barbers they use their women, who with two shells will grate away the hair." During the leftover time, they express themselves through bodily art and uncommon jewelry: "For their apparel, they are some time covered with skins of wild beasts… … In each ear commonly they have three great holes, whereat they hang chains bracelets or copper." They identify the two genders and depict them with great separation; one gender cannot be seen doing the works of the opposite gender: "Then men spend their times in … menlike exercises, scorning to be seen in any woman-like exercise…." However, regardless of gender, children are loved with great care: "… yet they do love children very dearly." Creativity is brought into the design of musical instruments. Resources are brought together in imaginative ways to create unique, haunted sounds: "… make such a terrible noise as would rather frighten than delight any man…." Religion is thought of as worshipping out of fear: "Him they call Oke and serve him more of fear than love." Defeating the true meaning of religion by love, these dwellers serve the devil to prevent bad things from happening to them. Also out of fright is the service ot the chief ruler, Powhatan. If obedience is declined, intense punishment is distributed: "… certain malefactors to be bound hand and foot, having then having many of fires gathered great store of burning coals…." Inhumane actions serve as consequences, such as being burnt alive or getting ripped apart by another human: "… then doth he proceed with shells and reeds to strip the skin from his head and face; then do they rip his belly and so burn him with the tree and all…."

 

—§—